Monday 23 April 2012

No auction of coal blocks for India power sector

India will not auction new coal mining blocks to the power sector and will instead allocate them to companies that offer to sell electricity cheapest, a government source said on Monday. The country is introducing a new system that will put an end to allocation of captive blocks to power plants at the government's discretion, as done in most cases in the past, and will help bring transparency at a time when the government is being buffeted by corruption scandals.

Power companies will be vying for about 16 of 54 coal blocks that the government has earmarked for allocation through bidding expected to take place by the year-end. "Auctioning of blocks will happen for cement and steel companies. But for power it will be through competitive tariff-based bidding," a senior coal ministry source said on condition of anonymity as the matter is still under discussion.

By using a method linked to tariffs, the government hopes to keep electricity costs low. Power tariffs are a highly political issue in a country where in some states millions of farmers are offered free electricity as a vote-winner.

The call for auctioning of coal blocks has grown following a leaked report by the federal auditor that accused Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's government of giving up $211 billion in potential revenues by giving away coal assets too cheaply.

No coal block has been awarded since 2009. In the past, a few captive mines had been allocated to power producers offering the cheapest electricity rates but discretionary allocations have been more prevalent. 

The coal ministry is appointing a consulting firm, probably within a month, to help with the auctioning and expects to finalise reserve prices for the blocks in the next four months, the source said. Power companies are likely to be attracted to the bidding as blocks will provide them with an assured supply of a fuel shotages of which have crippled expansion in the sector and forced many power plants to run below capacity.

In some cases, power companies with captive coal blocks are also allowed to sell a small portion of electricity in the open market where they can get higher tariffs.  Coal accounts for more than half of India's power generation and will be required for 85 percent of the 76,000 megawatts additional capacity targeted in the next five years.

Source: Reuters

Thermal coal imports via Paradip jump 50%

Thermal coal imports through Paradip port improved by 50 per cent to six million tonnes during 2011-12. This comprised the lion’s share of the 16 million tonnes of import traffic handled by the port during the year. The sharp jump in coal import through the port is attributed to higher demand for low-ash content coal, said port authorities. 

"Thermal coal imports improved to 37 per cent of total imports in 2011-12, from 30 per cent of the 13 million tonne import traffic seen in 2010-11, due to increasing demand for low-ash content coal,” said Saroj Mishra, traffic manager of Paradip Port Trust.

Even though Orissa is the second largest coal producer in the country after Jharkhand with 25 per cent of country’s deposits, the high ash content in its coal makes it less viable to produce power. Local industrial houses, therefore, depend on low-ash imported coal found in Indonesia, South Africa and Australia to blend with the domestic coal for power generation. However, industries with captive power generation capacities said higher import during a weaker rupee regimes indicate a problem in supply, and not demand.

“Our 2011-12 coal buying was certainly higher than the previous year as we had problems with supply from MCL (Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd),” said P R Choudhry, executive director of National Aluminum Company’s smelter facility at Angul.

MCL is mandated to supply 4.7 million tonne tonnes of thermal coal to Nalco every year, but its supplies were 360,000 tonne less in the last fiscal, forcing the aluminum producer to import more coal. It had placed an import order for 200,000 tonnes of coal in September after a fall in production, he added. Due to fuel supply problems, the company’s aluminum production declined by seven per cent in 2011-12 to 413,000 tonnes as power constitutes an integral part of aluminum making.

Similarly, ferro chrome producer and trader Indian Metals and Ferro Alloys resorted to coal imports last fiscal as it was yet to develop the coal block allotted to it. Costlier coal imports had affected the bottom line of the company in the third quarter and is expected to dent the Jan-Mar profits too, said trade sources.

Source: Business Standard

Coal India could get to pass on cost of expensive imports

The government is weighing a new coal pricing dispensation to help Coal India (CIL) recover the extra cost of imported coal it might have to give power plants to comply with the fuel supply agreement (FSA). The agreement means Coal India must guarantee supply of at least 80% of fuel required by these plants. 

Government sources said a committee of secretaries led by Pulok Chatterjee, principal secretary to the Prime Minister, has been mandated to evolve a pricing dispensation where power companies will have to bear the extra cost of imported coal to the extent of difference in the quality of imported and domestic coal. 

The quality of imported coal is much superior to domestic coal. For example, the ash content in domestic coal can be as high as 40%, compared with 10% in imported coal. The gross calorific value (GCV) of domestic coal is 3,000-3,500 Kcal/kg while that of imported coal is 5,000-7,000 Kcal/kg. 

CIL will be allowed to recover the balance of the extra cost of imported coal by increasing overall coal price. In other words, the proposed pricing regime will allow CIL to supply imported coal to power plants without having to bear the extra cost. 

Industry experts differ over the merit of the move. “Rather than a committee deciding on commercial issues, a coal regulator should be appointed as early as possible,” said Dilipkumar Jena, senior consultant and knowledge manager (mining), PwC. On the other hand, the association of power producers (APP), a body of private power developers welcomed the move. “The increase in price of coal due to imports would need to spread over the entire quantity of domestic production to keep the power cost manageable,” said director-general Ashok Khurana. The government came out with a proposal to set up a coal regulator in 2008 but is yet to deliver on the promise. 

The government favours Coal India importing coal through state trading agency MMTC rather than on its own, since it wants the coal monopoly to focus on its primary mandate of production.
India’s coal import bill is projected to rise fast in coming years as the country undertakes implementation of ambitious capacity addition plans in the power sector while domestic coal production stagnates. It imported 40 million tonnes of thermal coal (valued at $3.2 billion) only in 2010-11. But this could go up to 250 million tonnes ($30 billion) by 2016-17, according to the International Energy Agency. 

The secretaries panel was set up in February after industrialists including Ratan Tata and Anil Ambani met Manmohan Singh too seek his intervention to tackle the fuel crisis in the power sector. The committee backed appointing MMTC as the nodal agency for importing coal because it has been importing coal for state electricity boards (SEBs) for several years. The SEBs specify quantity and quality of coal to the canalising agency. MMTC follows the Central Vigilance Commission’s public procurement guidelines which mandate international tendering and award of contract to the lowest bidder, making the procedure quite transparent. This route also saves time. 

After initial resistance from its board, Coal India signed FSAs with power companies for supplying at least 80% of the annually contracted quantity for 20 years as per the PMO’s directive. But the penalty quantum, which is payable by Coal India in case of short supply, has been reduced from 10% to 0.01% of the value of shortfall. 

As per an estimate, Coal India must import 20-30 million tonnes of coal in the current year if it has to meet its contractual commitment. The Coal India board reduced the penalty amount after the public sector company was issued a Presidential decree to ensure it signed FSAs with power companies. The decree came after the company’s board rejected a proposal to comply with the PMO’s directive.

Source: Financial Express

Coal is cheapest way to power a light bulb

RESEARCH CONDUCTED by a University of the West Indies energy think tank indicates that coal is the most efficient energy source in powering a light bulb.

Arguing that given the current inefficiencies in the electricity production and distribution system, it takes approximately two barrels of oil to keep a 100-watt light bulb burning continuously for a year, the think tank said using coal-generated energy to do the same job would reduce the cost significantly.

"Using LNG instead of oil would cost roughly half the amount to burn the light bulb, and using coal would be about one-seventh the cost," the group said.

The think tank said using current prices, it would cost US$178.70 to purchase two barrels of oil to power the incandescent bulb. It said if coal were to be utilised to do a similar job, it would take only 396 kilograms (871lb) of the product at a cost of US$23.8, or 13 per cent of the cost of oil. The think tank also said liquefied natural gas (LNG) would be a more expensive option to coal. The researchers argue that it would require 333 litres of LNG to power the same 100-watt bulb, which would cost US$83.3, or 47 per cent of the cost of oil.

About 871lb of coal is needed to power a 100-watt light bulb for 12 months.  

Source: The Gleaner

Indian Ministries bicker over incentives for coal sector

An increasing demand-supply mismatch in the Indian coal industry has triggered competing and often conflicting demands for incentives among administrative and regulatory agencies for coal and thermal power producers.
 
The Central Electricity Authority (CEA), the regulatory body for electricity producers, has sought the introduction of the concept of ‘mega infrastructure status’ for all coal projects above five-million-tons-a-year capacity for standalone and captive mines, which would entitle them to incentives such as a five-year tax holiday and exemptions from other local levies.

At the same time, the Coal Ministry has written to the Power Ministry seeking the review of coal mines allocated to thermal power producers since the former’s cost of production of coal was almost double that of coal supplied by government-owned Coal India Limited (CIL).

The CEA has backed its demands for tax sops with a projected coal requirement of 842-million tons a year by 2016, against a projected availability of 450-million tons a year from CIL. According to the industry regulator, even after assuming supplies of 100-million tons a year from captive mines allotted to power companies, thermal power plants would need to import 54-million tons a year by 2016.

The regulator has also sought policy changes to facilitate the introduction of updated technology for improvements in productivity at coal mines and the further relaxation of rules governing the import of coal into the domestic market.

While the power regulator was batting for incentives for captive coal blocks, the Coal Ministry has sent a note to the Power Ministry seeking a review of coal blocks allotted to independent power producers and investors in ultra mega power plants (UMPP), whose cost a ton of coal production was double that of CIL.

The Coal Ministry has given the example of Reliance Power’s 4 000 MW Sasan UMPP, which mined coal at a cost of $17.33/t against a of production cost of $8.63/t for CIL in an adjoining block.

Consumers would have benefited from lower electricity tariffs had the coal blocks of Moher and Moher Amlorhi, in Sasan, been allotted to CIL with fuel supply agreements with Reliance Power instead of the former mining the coal, Coal Secretary Alok Perti said in a communication to his counterpart in the Power Ministry, P Uma Shankar.

In view of this, the Coal Ministry has sought a review of the cost of production of coal for all private investors in UMPP including that of government-owned NTPC Limited, the country’s largest electricity producer.

The exchange of missives between the two Ministries was prompted by a draft report of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India, which was leaked to the media. The report came down heavily on the free allocation of coal blocks to private power producers resulting in massive revenue loss to the Exchequer.

Source: Mining Weekly

Call for MCL to grant coal linkage to OPGC

The State Government has requested the Mahanadi Coalfields Limited (MCL) to grant interim coal linkage to the Orissa Power Generation Corporation (OPGC) which is in the process of adding capacity to the existing thermal power station at Banharpalii in Jharsuguda district. The State-run OPGC having two units of 210-MW capacity thermal power plant each is putting up two more units of 660-MW capacity (super critical) each at the same location to cater to the power requirement of the State.

Though the Ministry of Coal had allocated two coal blocks in the Ib Valley coalfields at Manoharpur and its deep side to OPGC for its captive consumption, the development of coal blocks is delayed for want of statutory clearance by the Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF). The MoEF classified the two blocks as ‘No-Go’ category and after much persuasion by the State Government the Ministry reclassified the same as ‘Go’ category. The State Government lost valuable 18 months due to objections raised by the MoEF.

“The expansion plan of the State is at an advance stage and the two new units are scheduled to be commissioned during the latter part of the 2016-17 financial year,” Energy Secretary G Mathivathanan said in a letter to MCL Chairman and Managing Director AN Sahay. MCL is a subsidiary of Coal India.

The scheduled coal production is likely to be delayed and there exists a gap between the commercial operation of the power plant and the full coal production from the allocated mine, Mathivathanan said. Meanwhile, OPGC has also applied for tapering coal linkage for the new units to the Ministry of Coal and the Ministry of Power has also recommended the case of the State PSU for interim coal linkage.

“In order to meet the power needs of the State, it will be highly appreciated if MCL can provide the interim coal requirement of OPGC to the tune of 16 million tonnes over a period of three years from the latter part of 2016-17 from Basundhara coal mines ...,” the Energy Secretary said. Since OPGC has planned to construct a merry-go-round (MGR) system from Manoharpur to the plant site for evacuation of coal, it will be much easier for MCL to supply coal for the interim period using the system, he said.

Sources believed that the State Government’s proposal to MCL for setting up a coal washery and coal reject-based thermal power plant in joint venture is an attempt to facilitate the tapering coal linkage to the new thermal units of OPGC.

Source: IBN Live

Jindal Steel Extends Drop as Panel Scraps Coal Project Approval

Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. (JSP), India’s biggest steel producer by market value, fell to its lowest price in more than three months after a court-appointed panel scrapped the approval for its coal mining project. 

The shares fell for the second day, declining 4.3 percent to 484.55 rupees, the lowest level since Jan. 9, at the close in Mumbai. The stock has risen 7 percent this year, compared with an 11 percent gain in the benchmark Sensitive Index. 

The National Green Tribunal, set up in October 2010 to hear cases relating to environmental protection and forest conservation, scrapped the project on April 20 and asked the Ministry of Environment and Forests to repeat public hearings. The tribunal said the environment ministry ignored the mandatory procedures while granting the license to Jindal Steel. 

The company plans to develop a 4 million metric ton coal mine and a washery of similar size in the central Indian state of Chhattisgarh. Jindal Steel is seeking to build coal mines to feed its proposed power plants in the country. 

Sushil Maroo, the group chief financial officer at Jindal Steel, didn’t respond to two calls made to his mobile phone. 

The tribunal on March 30 suspended environment approval given to Posco’s proposed $12 billion steel plant in Orissa state. It said the environment ministry should reassess the conditions on which clearance was granted to the project last year, Environment Minister Jayanthi Natarajan said that day. 

Source: Bloomberg

Scandal Spurs Indian Coal Auction

India's government, under fire for a series of multibillion-dollar corruption scandals, plans to auction coal-mining licenses publicly for the first time in an attempt to enhance transparency in the sector. The government also hopes the move will boost private investment in the industry as India has become more dependent than it had been on imports because of slow domestic production.

The decision came after India's Comptroller and Auditor General, in a draft report leaked last month, slammed the government for doling out cut-price coal blocks to private and state-owned companies without rigorous, open bidding.

Source: Wall Street Journal

Euro Coal-July DES trades at API2 -$3.10

European prompt physical coal prices were little changed on Monday but two Q3 DES ARA trades took place at over $3.00 a tonne below the API2 index, a level which some players took as a bearish signal.

July DES ARA cargoes were valued at around $96.50 a tonne on Monday at the time the index-linked trades went through, valuing them at around $93.00, traders said. "This doesn't bode well for Q3 prices if anybody's willing to sell at that kind of a discount now," one trader said.

Stockpiles in Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp are significantly higher than year-ago levels, which will help cap any price rises during the next several months. EMO, EBS and OBA stockpiles were over 5.6 million tonnes at the end of last week, with a further 2-3 million in smaller terminals.

Most of this coal was pre-bought by utilities and traders who believe the market contango justifies carrying stocks until the winter, when consumption and prices are expected to be stronger but the size of inventories has got to be a disincentive to buy fresh cargoes, they said.
There were no fixed-price trades reported.

The longer the market stays in a fairly tight price range and the longer it takes for anticipated Chinese high-volume buying to emerge, the less liquidity there is in the market and less appetite to trade it, traders said.

"For every buyer, there are about four sellers but even with bid/offer spreads 50 cents apart, very little is trading," another trader said. South African prices were also little changed but bids moved down by around 50 cents with no trades reported.

TRADES
Two July DES ARA index-linked trades went through on globalCOAL at $3.10 a tonne below the API2 index.

PRICES
A July DES ARA cargo was bid at $96.25 and offered at $96.75, little changed.
A June South African cargo was bid at $99.50 and offered at $100.00, down 50 cents.

Source: Reuters.com

Coal Seen Rebounding as China Sets Steel Output Record

Coking coal prices are set to rebound as early as July from four straight quarterly declines as China and India seek raw material overseas to fire new steel production in the world’s fastest-growing major economies. 

Contract prices that fell to $206 a metric ton for the quarter ending June 30 may rebound to average $225 a ton this financial year, based on the mean estimate of 10 analysts, steelmakers and mining companies surveyed by Bloomberg. Contracts of coking coal, a key ingredient used to make steel, peaked at $330 in the June quarter last year. 

China, the largest steel producer, is leading demand growth forecast at almost 10 percent this year. It started about 10 new blast furnaces in the past six months, lifting output to a record in March, according to market researcher Custeel.com. India, the third-biggest steelmaker, is set to boost capacity a third to more than 100 million tons by March in a five-year $1 trillion plan to build roads, bridges and railway networks. 

“Rising Indian imports will have a positive impact on coking coal,” said Natalie Robertson, an analyst at ANZ Banking Group Ltd. in Melbourne. “The near-term prices will more closely track development in China.” 

China may surpass Japan as the biggest coking coal importer by 2015, a position it may eventually relinquish to India, Robertson said. 

China is encouraging global use of the yuan and allowing more overseas investors in its local capital markets as Premier Wen Jiabao seeks to shift the focus of economic growth to domestic demand from slowing export industries. The government broadened the yuan’s trading band against the dollar to 1 percent from its daily reference rate on April 16, having held the limit at 0.5 percent since May 2007.

Recovery Forecast

Growth in China slowed more than forecast last quarter to the least in almost three years, prompting economists to predict a rebound as the government loosens policy to counter weak domestic and European demand. Gross domestic product expanded 8.1 percent from a year earlier after an 8.9 percent fourth- quarter gain, the National Bureau of Statistics said.
Demand for imported coking coal in China may rise 37 percent to 63 million tons this year from last year, Australia’s Bureau of Resources and Energy Economics said on March 21. Consumption is projected to increase due to state investment in steel-intensive infrastructure such as highways and rail networks, linking the less-developed provinces in western China to demand centers in the east, it said.

Infrastructure Demand

Urbanization and infrastructure building in central and western China will fuel “very strong” steel demand, Fortescue Metals Group Ltd. (FMG) Chief Executive Officer Neville Power said on April 3. The 7.5 percent economic growth target Jiabao announced for this year, the lowest since 2004, may result in 5 percent annual increases in steel demand, he said. 

Global trade in coking coal may rise 9.6 percent to 297 million tons this year, compared with a 0.7 percent drop last year, the Bureau of Resources and Energy Economics said. 

Mongolia, which became China’s biggest supplier of coking coal in July, will probably continue to grow this year, Battsengel Gotov, chief executive officer at Mongolian Mining Corp. (975), said in a March 7 interview. 

“For Europe, China, Japan and South Korea, the main tailwind for metallurgical coal is there’s room for restocking across the world,” Bloomberg Industries analyst Andrew Cosgrove said. “China remains the wild card because Mongolia is stealing seaborne volumes by exporting more land-borne tonnages.”

Indian Imports

India’s coking coal needs may jump 13 million tons this financial year as its rising appetite for the alloy drives companies to add capacity worth at least $10 billion in the year that started April 1, said Ashish Upadhyay, associate director at Fitch Ratings in a telephone interview on April 9. Indian demand may support coking coal prices as most of the local requirements are met through imports, he said.

Last year, India imported 13 percent of the 271 million tons of coking coal traded globally. Australia is estimated to have shipped 148 million tons of the steelmaking ingredient in the year ended March 31, the Bureau of Resources and Energy Economics said in its March 21 report. 

Coking coal prices touched a record last year after floods disrupted output and shipments from mines in Australia, the world’s biggest exporter of the fuel, said Arun Kumar Jagatramka, chairman of Gujarat NRE Coke Ltd. (GNC), which owns mines in Australia’s New South Wales state. Prices have since declined as supplies were restored and demand waned in Japan and in debt- laden Europe.

Auto Sales

Indian steel consumption may increase 8 percent during the year started April 1, faster than last year’s growth of 5.5 percent, fueled by investment in infrastructure projects and improving sales of automobiles, said G.K. Basak, executive secretary at the steel ministry’s joint plant committee.
Demand may improve as India reduces interest rates on loans, critical for developing industrial projects and buying homes, cars and appliances, said Tapan Ray, executive director for mining at PricewaterhouseCoopers Ltd. in Mumbai. Coking coal prices may range between $220 and $230 a ton this year and may rise higher if a European recovery starts, he said. 
 
Source: Bloomberg

Saturday 21 April 2012

CIL to permit private sector in coal mining

The Indian federal government is working on a proposal under which state-owned Coal India Ltd. (CIL) would engage private sector companies to undertake mining on behalf of the coal miner, reports Business Standard.

A PTI report published in the newspaper says that the government move is a result of criticism for its inability to meet the growing demand for coal. Citing unnamed sources, the report says that the proposal to involve the private sector under the public-private partnership (PPP) mode was recently discussed between top level government officials.
Reports suggest that India’s Coal Secretary Alok Perti recently convened a meeting between private coal mining companies and CIL to identify projects that could be outsourced to private coal miners. The meeting will discuss all the details on the proposed model, including the legal framework under which private mining companies can enter the sector through the competitive bidding route.
The Planning Commission had earlier written to Indian Coal Minister Prakash Jayaswal in March, asking his ministry to explore development of projects on a PPP basis to expand coal production.

How Coal Bidding Works

Media reports suggest that according to the proposed model, bids are invited for a particular coal block that has to be mined. While the ownership of the block remains with CIL, the mine is given out on a long-term agreement and the coal produced is bought back by CIL at a fixed price. The bids are ranked on the basis of cost per metric ton and these have to be lower than the notified cost of CIL.
CIL has already outsourced two mines under the same model as part of a pilot project to Essel Mining, an AV Birla Group company, under a long-term contract. The federal government and CIL are under pressure to enhance coal production and fulfill the demand by domestic power producers, steel mills and cement manufacturers, fertilizer and chemical industries.
Coal is the primary raw material for thermal power generation in India. Coal accounts for more than half of the country’s power generation. It is also the main fuel for steel mills and cement makers and many other industries. In addition to industrial demand, coal is still a basic fuel to make food for many Indians in rural parts of country.

Coal Monster Growing


Indian power demand is on the rise. Currently, India has a power generation capacity of 170,000 MW and expects to add 62,374 MW by 2012. The Indian federal government also has plans to set up 16 Ultra Mega Power Projects (UMPPs), each with a minimum generating capacity of 4000 MW.
But CIL remains unable to supply enough coal as demanded by the various industries — especially the power sector.
It may be recalled that domestic power producers and steel manufacturers frequently import coal to fill their requirements. Many Indian companies have also acquired overseas coal blocks for the fuel supply. Experts believe that the country’s need for coal imports could jump nearly 70 percent next fiscal year to 142 million metric tons.
As per the Planning Commission, domestic coal demand will increase to 1 billion tons by the end of the 12th Five-Year Plan (2012-17), necessitating about 200 million tons of imports to bridge the shortfall in domestic output. The commission has also estimated that domestic production will rise to 770 million tons by 2017 on the basis of projected annual growth of around 7 percent in output.
India’s federal government has admitted that there was a wide gap between availability and commitments made by the company to various consumers.
India’s Coal Minister Prakash Jayaswal recently informed the lower house of the parliament (Lok Sabha) that there is a wide gap between the availability of coal and the commitments made by CIL through fuel supply agreements (FSAs) and letters of assurance (LOAs) for supply of coal.

Coal India Ltd. Can’t Deliver


Reports suggest that CIL, accounting for over 81 percent of India’s coal production, has missed its revised production target as it produced only 435.84 million metric tons of coal in fiscal 2011-12 against the target of 447 million metric tons. CIL has already missed the target in 2010-11 with the production inching up only 0.2 percent over a year before, touching 431 million metric tons.
CIL cited various reasons for the downward revision in the production target, such as heavy rainfall, strikes and delays in gaining forestry grants and environmental clearances to coal projects.
CIL had earlier asked the government to scale down its production target for the 2011-12 to 448 million tons, fearing it would not be able to make up for the slippage in output in the first half of the fiscal year. However, the Planning Commission is likely to set a coal production target of 574.4 million tons for 2012-13.
Meanwhile, CIL is under huge pressure to supply the fuel to domestic power producers because back on April 3, the government issued a presidential directive to CIL that will make it mandatory for the company to supply a minimum level of fuel to thermal power projects.
Earlier this year in February, the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) had asked CIL to sign such agreements after a meeting with private-sector power producers in January. The PMO had given CIL a deadline of March 31, 2012, to sign these agreements for the power projects commissioned before December 2011. In case CIL failed to meet the 80 percent of committed coal supply, it would be penalized.
But CIL’s board members rejected the prime minister’s directive to sign the agreements, saying the penalty clause under such contracts was too stringent. After the presidential directive, however, CIL was forced to sign the fuel supply agreements with power producers.

CIL Not Out Of The Woods


This decision has created another controversy. One of its minority shareholders, British hedge fund Children’s Investment Fund, has alleged that directing the public sector coal giant to sign fuel supply pacts with power producers would amount to “direct transfer” of $19 billion to the private sector.
According to a PTI report, the fund has initiated legal proceedings against CIL, charging it with selling coal at a price that’s up to 70 percent below the market price, hurting minority shareholders.
According to the fund, the coal prices should be linked to market rates as it would bolster the profitability of Coal India Ltd.
Source: AG Metal Miner.com

India’s economic star is fading

In the aftermath of the global financial crisis, optimists hoped that the BRIC (Brazil, Russia,     India, China) countries would drive the world’s economic engine. But those hopes have sputtered.

China’s economic growth has slowed to its lowest rate in three years. Brazil’s economic growth has fallen to under 3% from around 7.5%. Russia’s economy is heavily dependent on oil and energy prices. And India? It seems destined to never fulfill its economic potential.

In the 30 years following independence in 1947, India achieved a modest rate of economic growth of 3-4% per annum. The “Hindu rate of growth” was a derogatory term coined by economist Raj Krishna to draw attention to India’s poor performance compared to other Asian economies.
Reforms in the 1990s paved the way for a period of expansion and relative prosperity for India — exemplified by the marketing slogan “India Shining,” which was first popularized by the then-ruling Bharatiya Janata Party for the 2004 Indian general elections.
Over the last two decades, India’s economy has almost quadrupled in size, growing at an average rate of about 7% per annum. India’s GDP rose by 43% between 2007 and 2012, slightly less than China’s, which increased by 56%, but much faster than developed economies that grew only 2%.
In late 2011, the Indian government’s 12th five-year plan forecast growth of 9% between 2012 and 2017. Yet by early 2012, India’s growth had slowed to around 6%, high by the standards of developed countries but well below the levels required to maintain economic momentum and improve the living standards of its citizens.

Internal fissures

Increasingly, India’s problems — poor public finances, weak international position, structurally flawed businesses, poor infrastructure, corruption and political atrophy — threaten to overwhelm its potential.
In recent years, India has consistently run a public sector deficit of 9%-10% of GDP, including the state governments and off-balance-sheet items. The problem of large budget deficits is compounded by one major cause — poorly targeted subsidies for fertilizer, food and petroleum which may amount to as much as 9% of GDP.
In March 2012, India brought down a budget that forecasted a fiscal deficit of 5.9%, well above its previous fiscal deficit target of 4.6%. India’s strong rate of recent growth (an average rate of 14% between 2004-05 and 2009-10) made large deficits, on the order of 10 % of GDP, relatively sustainable. Slowing growth will increasingly constrain India’s ability to run continuing large deficits.
India’s government debt is around 70% of GDP. As its debt is denominated in rupees and sold domestically, India faces no immediate financing difficulty. Instead, the government’s heavy borrowing requirements crowds out private business.
But India is running a current account deficit of over 3% of GDP, and trending higher — among the highest in the G-20. The cause is slowing exports as a result of weakness in India’s trading partners, while imports, mainly non-discretionary purchases of commodities and oil, have increased. India imports around 75% of its crude oil.
India’s weak external position has manifested itself in the volatility of the rupee, which was one of the worst performers among Asian currencies in 2011. Indian businesses, which have unhedged foreign currency borrowings, have incurred significant losses as the value of their debt rises as the rupee falls. Indian companies face large debt maturities in the coming year. The ability to refinance the debt coming due remains uncertain in an environment of a weakening economy as well weakening company outlooks.
India has more than US$300 billion in currency reserves. Foreign debts that must be repaid in the current year are around 40%-45% of this amount, which if deducted highlights the increasing weakness in India’s external position.

Crisis brewing

Slowing growth, tighter credit and other economic problems have increased corporate defaults to the highest level in 10 years. Non-performing loans are now around 2.5%-3% of bank assets. Analysts estimate that the major banks have around $25 billion in bad loans, an amount which is increasing.
The Indian government has already moved to recapitalize state-owned banks to ensure their capital position. In the process, the budget deficit and the government borrowing requirements have come under increasing pressure.
India is plagued by inadequate infrastructure. In critical sectors like power, transport and utilities, there are significant shortages. Yet political pressure to keep utility costs low has impeded investment.
In the electricity sector, for example, state-owned utilities that purchase power from producers and sell to residential users have incurred large losses. State governments are unwilling to raise retail consumer rates despite increases in the price that power producers charge the utilities. Attempts to increase rail ticket prices have failed. The Railways Minister’s own party opposed the proposal and demanded he be removed from his job.
Increasingly, the structural problems and poor history of projects has made foreign investors cautious, creating a shortage of foreign capital for investment in infrastructure.
While its workforce is young and growing, there is a dearth of skills. The shortage has led to large increases in salaries for skilled workers. Higher wages increase the cost of Indian businesses, making them internationally less competitive and fueling domestic inflation.
Still, the key drivers of growth remain intact, including a large population, a substantial domestic market, high savings rates that have financed investment and an educated, English-speaking workforce which is under employed. But the question is whether India has the collective will and ability to overcome this sea of troubles.
Source: marketwatch.com

Coal to make power's future brighter?

Coal India Limited (CIL) is the largest coal miner in the world. Coal production has however stagnated over the past 2-3 years and Indian power companies were left in the lurch. Like most companies in the sector, the miner's performance has been marred by regulatory hurdles and land acquisition problems.

To try and address this supply lacuna, CIL has been ordered by the government, to sign contracts agreeing to supply at least 80% of the coal requirement of utilities that have been crippled by inadequate fuel supply. If CIL does not meet this requirement, it will have to pay a paltry penalty of 0.01% (with no penalty in the first three years) of the value of shortfall.

But, such an insufficient penalty clause reduces the efficacy of the fuel supply agreement (FSA). The carrots and sticks approach could have worked wonders. But in this case, there are no carrots to increase production and the meager penalty for not meeting targets will not force the monopoly to ramp up production. Thus, coal supply will continue to be a problem for power producers in energy starved India. Since the penalty only kicks in after three years, almost nothing has changed in the short term for energy producers such as Tata Power, NTPC, GVK Power, etc.

Coal India expects to raise its output to 464 million tonnes (MT) in FY13, after producing about 436 MT in FY12, an increase of only 6%. It would need an additional 64 MT in the current fiscal year to meet obligations under the new fuel pacts. Since the company may not be able to boost production in line with demand, it may have to resort to coal imports. Domestic coal is typically 40% cheaper than global prices. Who will bear the extra burden in case of a shortfall is not clear.
India plans to add 76,000 MW capacity to its existing 191,000 MW power production capacity in the next five years. Thus it would need to rapidly increase coal production to feed these power plants. Currently more than half of the total capacity is fueled by coal and there is still no suitable alternate.

While the penalties on Coal India for not meeting its target may not be very harsh, there is one silver lining on the horizon. Some producers see the revival of binding fuel supply contracts as a positive sign. This may help these companies get necessary funding for their products. Bankers who had earlier refused to disburse loans without long-term supply arrangements in place may now be more willing. This, coupled with the recent 0.5% repo rate cut may ease some of the pains of power producers.

Source: msnnews.com

A Silver Lining in India’s Coal Crisis

A power crisis in energy-starved India that has stalled the construction of thermal plants doesn’t strike one immediately as a piece of good news. But for activists and many villagers in areas where power plants are slated to be built, it’s a silver lining.
In Nellore on the southeastern coast of India, a port was built four years ago that could draw in coal. More than two dozen large plants were then proposed. And the electricity produced could power the state, Andhra Pradesh, which has crippling blackouts that can last several hours, if not days, in some areas.
Today, however, most of the plants have dim prospects. Cows graze placidly on land that had been bought by power companies to build plants. Day laborers painstakingly hack trees to clear the land. There’s no rush. The power plants are missing their most important ingredient – coal. That’s because of an insufficient domestic supply of the black rock. And imported coal has become unviable after India’s biggest supplier, Indonesia, recently doubled coal prices.
“So far nothing has been commissioned,” said Dinesh Kumar, a senior energy department officialHe added that only a handful of the power plants are likely to get built.
But the stalled work brings relief for activists and villagers who were alarmed at the rapid pace at which power plants had been approved in Nellore.
“Sri Potti Sriramulu Nellore district is fast becoming the state’s dumping yard for intensely polluting coal-based thermal plants,” states a January report from the Human Rights Forum in Andhra Pradesh. “The appraisal bodies have been clearing these projects one-by-one, without looking at the compound impact of all these projects taken together.”
The group said the projects together would have contaminated the surroundings with chemicals, and 2,700 tons of sulfur and 130,000 tons of toxic ash would have been spewed into the environment.
Local officials say that the estimated 25,000 megawatts of power that would have been generated if all the planned plants were built is unlikely. Power plants being built in the next three years will have a combined capacity of 15,000 megawatts, according to data provided by government officials.
A research group that lobbies for sustainable and equitable development says that environmental clearances are being granted at a rate which is more than six times the actual installation of plants in India.
Like other sectors, the shortage of power reflects a bungled approach to industrial development in India.
“We don’t have clear-cut legislations in India like the Clean Air Act in the U.S.,” said Vijay Kumar, a doctor in Nellore who was involved in the protests against the plants. He said that he treats about two people every day who have respiratory infections, many who had worked in an old local thermal plant.
A short distance from one of the power plants in Nellore, at a tribal hamlet of the Yanadis, a marginalized community, villagers are apprehensive about the potential pollution of the plant. One fisherman said that the ongoing construction had reduced his catch of fish at the close-by Buckingham Canal. In surrounding villages, residents say they don’t see any benefit from the emerging plants. Some point out that their education and skill levels are unlikely to get them jobs at the plants.
Luckily for those opposed to the plants, it doesn’t look like the emerging plants will be fueled anytime soon. Coal production is increasing at an average of 5 percent a year while power plant capacity is growing between 10 and 15 percent. The irony is that India has one of the world’s largest reserves of coal but state-owned Coal India, which controls 80 percent of production, isn’t digging fast enough. That hasn’t stopped it from winning a “company of the year award”.

Source: The New York Times

Indonesia still mulling coal export tax-govt


Indonesia is still discussing an export tax on thermal coal for this year, as it seeks to boost revenues and investment in the country's mining industry, a trade ministry official said on Friday.

An official with the ministry of energy and minerals for world's top exporter of thermal coal had reportedly ruled out a tax on coal earlier this week, but a trade ministry official said it was an idea still on the table.

"We have not yet decided whether coal will be dropped or not from the plan because we are still in discussions," said Deddy Saleh, the director general of foreign trade at the trade ministry, said on Friday.

"For sure, the government will impose an export tax on minerals although we have not decided on the tariff," said Saleh. "On coal we are still in discussions about whether we are going to impose the tax or not."


GROWING DEMAND FOR COAL

Demand for Indonesia's coal comes mainly from China and India, which are expected to lift coal imports significantly over the next five years. Output will hit 390 million tonnes for 2012, industry groups say.

The world's top exporter of refined tin and home to the second biggest copper mine, i s keen on developing its mining industry, create jobs and turn into a producer of higher-value finished goods from an exporter of raw materials.

Indonesia had failed previously to impose a coal export tax to secure domestic coal supplies, with the plan dropped after court action by industry.

"Although several years ago government dropped the coal export tax because of a Supreme Court decision, the situation is different now," Saleh added. "We are preparing arguments on coal export tax."


CONFUSED INVESTORS

The export tax proposal, which could be 25 percent this year and 50 percent in 2013, is part of a flurry of recent plans supporting a 2009 mining law aimed at increasing state revenue from a sector that contributes about 12 percent of GDP in Southeast Asia's top economy.

But many of the plans announced have left investors scratching their heads as different government departments offer conflicting information.

"It looks like there is about fifteen hundred people trying to organise a party for six," said Lachlan Shaw, senior commodity analyst at Commonwealth Bank of Australia. "It seems that there is a different minister saying something different every day."

The country is also due to ban exports of some unprocessed metals from 2014 despite industry pleas to delay the plans because of a lack of smelter and processing capacity.

The regulation is particularly vexing for miners holding permits called IUPs, w hich may now need to detail how they will process metals domestically, or be forced to stop all exports as early as Ma y of this year.

There are currently more than 10,000 IUP holders, and most are small-scale miners producing nickel and bauxite for buyers in China and India.

This week, a government official suggested that small-scale miners should team up with larger miners, many of whom already have smelters, to help them with the 2014 domestic processing requirement.

In addition to the export tax policy, Saleh said the trade ministry is also planning to issue a decree that will only allow registered exporters of minerals and metals to export.

"All the mineral and coal exports will have to be verified by appointed surveyors," he said, adding that only registered exporters with detailed plans for downstream processing and smelting would be awarded export permits by the government.

Many major miners in Indonesia have claimed that they won't be impacted by changes to the country's mining laws, as they hold different contracts that are decades-long and contain clauses that are difficult to change.
Source: Reuters